|
|
|
|
@ -2997,9 +2997,9 @@ Such older advice is now obsolete; it does not add value, and it interferes with
|
|
|
|
|
vector<int> g(const vector<int>& vx)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// ...
|
|
|
|
|
f() = vx; // prevented by the "const"
|
|
|
|
|
fct() = vx; // prevented by the "const"
|
|
|
|
|
// ...
|
|
|
|
|
return f(); // expensive copy: move semantics suppressed by the "const"
|
|
|
|
|
return fct(); // expensive copy: move semantics suppressed by the "const"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The argument for adding `const` to a return value is that it prevents (very rare) accidental access to a temporary.
|
|
|
|
|
|